A
global library of information and links
about nuclear power, nuclear weapons,
nuclear waste contamination, and citizen action for
sustainable energy and
human survival. Exploring paths beyond the global
culture of violence.
One of the most significant nuclear issues is that
while human beings
are fallible and prone to making occasional mistakes,
nuclear materials
are utterly unforgiving and never forget.
Once leaked, spilled or burned,
their residues will cause illnesses and deaths for
tens of thousands (and
in the case of Depleted Uranium, billions) of
years. This is not the kind
of legacy we want to leave for our children and all
their descendants.
Dennis Rivers, Editor, nonukes.org
consortium of peace and ecology groups
Los
Alamos Fire Burns Near Nuclear Weapons Factory --
July 2011
NUCLEAR WEAPONS UPDATE/Editor's
Comment: The leading strategists of both the
Republican and Democratic parties have reached the
recent conclusion that the United States does not
actually need nuclear weapons any more. The scales of
military strategy have tipped against nuclear weapons.
The continuing manufacture and deployment of nuclear
weapons endangers the USA much more through
proliferation risks than the actual nuclear weapons
could protect the USA through military use.
The only people who want nuclear weapons now are the
wealthy corporations that manufacture them, and the
politicians they have bankrolled. This is exactly the
influence of the "military-industrial complex" that
Pres. Eisenhower, a Republican president, warned us
against in his farewell address. And it is a perfect
example of an out-of-control government program that the
country no longer needs, but that bureaucrats and
contractors keep going for their own interests.
Meanwhile the United States has fought two wars in the
past 10 years, and in each of those wars American
soldiers died for lack of proper equipment. We have sent
our young soldiers into battle wearing outdated flak
jackets and driving Humvees with no armor, while
spending billions on nuclear weapons that we don't need.
Please explain to me the patriotism or the military
logic of this. We in the United States are also laying
off schoolteachers, firefighters and police officers. We
are cutting out the things we really need, in order to
buy something, nuclear weapons, that we don't need.
Excuse me?!!!
A
group of Japan’s most prominent public intellectuals
have launched a movement to amass ten million
signatures calling for an end to Japanese nuclear
power. The group, which includes Uchihashi Katsuto,
Ooe Kenzaburo, Ochiai, Kamata Satoshi, Sakamoto
Ryuichi, Sawachi Hisae, Setouchi Jakucho, Tsujii
Takashi and Tsurumi Shunsuke, also plan a nationwide
series of protests on September 11, the six month
anniversary of the tsunami and the beginning of the
Fukushima crisis. The group’s
website (in
Japanese) (in English)
describes their plan
By Harvey
Wasserman, 5/20/2011, Reader Supported News.
Fukushima may be in an
apocalyptic downward spiral. Forget the
corporate-induced media coma that says otherwise ...
or nothing at all. Lethal radiation is spewing
unabated. Emission levels could seriously escalate.
There is no end in sight. The potential is many
times worse than Chernobyl. Containing this disaster
may be beyond the abilities of Tokyo Electric or the
Japanese government. [CALL YOUR CONGRESS
PEOPLE -- DEMAND MORE ACTION] more
No
to Nuclear Power
Open Letter from Nobel Peace Laureates
On the eve of the 25th anniversary of the
Chernobyl nuclear disaster, April 26 - and six weeks
after the devastating nuclear disaster in Japan - ten
Nobel Peace Laureates called upon world leaders to
invest in safer and more peaceful future by committing
to renewable energy sources. The Laureates sent an
open letter to 31 heads of state whose countries are
currently heavily invested in nuclear power
production, or are considering investing in nuclear
power. Read
the open letter written by the ten Nobel Laureates.
Three weeks
into the nuclear crisis in Japan, minute traces of
radioactive dust have circled the globe, even arriving
in Maryland and Virginia.
Fallout from
the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has landed on 30
exquisitely sensitive detectors on desolate Arctic
islands, on the tops of tall buildings and in other
windy locales across the Northern Hemisphere, according
to the Comprehensive
Test Ban Treaty Organization, which maintains
those sensors. Sniffing the air like silent sentinels,
the 63
shack-like stations (with 17 more planned) are
capturing tiny radioactive particles in filters much
like those on a home furnace. more
United
States government engineers sent to help with the
crisis in Japan are warning that the troubled nuclear
plant there is facing a wide array of fresh threats
that could persist indefinitely, and that in some
cases are expected to increase as a result of the very
measures being taken to keep the plant stable,
according to a confidential assessment prepared by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Among the new
threats that were cited in the assessment, dated March
26, are the mounting stresses placed on the containment
structures as they fill with radioactive cooling water,
making them more vulnerable to rupture in one of the
aftershocks rattling the site after the earthquake and
tsunami of March 11. The document also cites the
possibility of explosions inside the containment
structures due to the release of hydrogen and oxygen
from seawater pumped into the reactors, and offers new
details on how semimolten fuel rods and salt buildup are
impeding the flow of fresh water meant to cool the
nuclear cores. more
By Amory B.
Lovins -- March 18, 2011 -- As heroic workers and
soldiers strive to save stricken Japan from a new
horror—radioactive fallout—some truths known for 40
years bear repeating. An earthquake-and-tsunami
zone crowded with 127 million people is an unwise place
for 54 reactors. The 1960s design of five Fukushima-I
reactors has the smallest safety margin and probably
can't contain 90 percent of meltdowns. The U.S. has six
identical and 17 very similar plants. more
3/15/2011 -- Democracy
Now
Japan Facing Biggest Catastrophe Since
Dawn of Nuclear Age
Poison
Fire: Eco-philosopher Joanna Macy speaks on
the spiritual challenges of nuclear power and
nuclear weapons
Giant, new, (and
completely unnecessary) nuclear weapons plant
proposed for northern New Mexico. (2011)
Get the facts from the Los
Alamos Study Group.
Flash from the Past: POWER -- A Song from 1979 No
Nukes Concert in New York City
This
1979 song was prophetic, predicting in its way both
the successes of wind and solar energy and
the nuclear disasters that would arrive in the coming
decades. (Leaks of radioactive waste at Hanford, WA,
are a slow-moving and under-noticed calamity on a par
with the much more dramatic crisis
in Fukushima, Japan.)
(Some browsers may require that you
click the start button twice.)
CNN
story on the changing face of solar energy
-- (May 12, 2010)
The new look in solar energy is mirrors rather than
photovoltaic panels.
The two technologies, working together, may supply one
quarter of
the world's electricity by 2050. Also see
Renewable
Energy World web site, and Duke
study finds solar power cheaper than nuclear
(July, 2010).
So much sun energy
falls of the deserts of the world that a single square
of desert
approximately 250 miles by 250 miles (less than 1% of
the world's deserts) could
produce all the power the world needs today. See
the Desertec
web site for more info.
nukey-poo:
Toxic
Radioactive Waste at Fernald, Ohio
(Oct. 2009) When nuclear power
advocates claim that nuclear energy is cheap,
they do so because they exclude the costs of both the
beginning and
the end of the nuclear energy process: both
uranium mining/smelting and toxic
waste guarding (there is no safe way to "dispose" of
it). The linked
news story is about nuclear waste from 50 years ago.
We will only
have to take intensive care of it for another 249,950
years. What a bargain!
Bottom
Line = WE REALLY DON'T NEED
DANGEROUS & EXPENSIVE NUCLEAR POWER.
STILL
TRUE IN 2010:
Bonnie Raitt, Jackson Browne, Graham Nash, Keb'
Mo' and Ben Harper...
joined in this
adaptation of the classic Buffalo Springfield song,
"For What It's Worth," to help stop a $50 billion loan
guarantee package for building new nuclear power
plants that was slipped into the 2007 Energy Bill. The
Fall 2007 campaign mounted by NukeFree.org
and allied environmental non-profit
organizations gathered over 120,000 signatures,
including those of the activists and artists listed on
the scroll above. After a media conference and lobby
day featuring Bonnie, Jackson, Graham and several
environmental organizations along with public pressure
on key Senators, Congress defeated the proposed loan
guarantees, handing the safe energy movement a huge
victory on the road to a green-powered
Earth. Check 'em out at NukeFree.org.
Details? Do I hear
you saying you want more @!#*&%%!
details?
Here is a 77-page technical
report
documenting the
ongoing problems with leaking nuclear
waste tanks that are contaminating the
groundwater around Hanford, Washington.
Web Site Editor's
comment: How 'cheap' is nuclear power if
its waste poisons the water and sickens
untold future generations? How 'safe' do
nuclear weapons keep us, if our
continual reliance on them teaches every
ambitious politician on planet Earth
that nuclear weapons are the path to
real political power?
half-hour talk show on NPR 6/2/2006 NEW PROPOSALS TO REVIVE THE NUCLEAR
POWER INDUSTRY
How many Yucca Mountains will we need to handle giant
new quantities
of long-term deadly waste? Recycling spent power
plant fuel will create
unmanageable quantities of nuclear weapons material.
How much will it
cost to keep this material out of the hands of
terrorists? Cheap electricity, anyone?
Letter to the Editor of the
L.A. Times
regarding the allegedly economical costs of
nuclear power 6/23/05
(they did not publish the letter, but the
questions won't go
away just because they choose to ignore them)
UNANSWERED
QUESTIONS ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER COSTS
Dear Editor,
Times staff writer Ralph Vartabedian asserts
in his June 22nd [2005] article that "Existing
nuclear plants already produce electricity
more cheaply than coal or natural gas."
Later in the article it becomes clear that
this is only true because the insurance costs
and waste disposal costs of nuclear power
plants have been shifted to taxpayers.
Since nuclear power plants are giant
radiation-bombs-waiting-to-happen, some
unknown but probably quite large amount of
security costs is almost certainly being
shifted to the taxpayers. too. Not
mentioned in the article are other costs of
nuclear energy, such as cancer among uranium
miners and the costs of decommissioning the
giant plants when their 30 year life-span
(governed by metal fatigue) is over. There are
many safer alternatives to nuclear power,
including conservation innovations, wind,
solar, biomass and geothermal. If we are
going to use heavy infusions of tax dollars to
subsidize and fund our energy choices,
citizens have the right to choose more
sustainable and less dangerous energy paths.
To be more specific on the cost issue, I would
seriously like to know if Mr. Vartabedian's
cost figures include the discounted present
value of storing and guarding nuclear waste
for 250,000 years! I think the
idea that we are going to be able to just dump
our radioactive waste in a cavern somewhere in
the desert and then forget about it is a
fantasy, and a high stakes gamble with the
health of future generations. How cheap is
nuclear energy if leaking waste dumps in
future centuries sicken people with cancer and
leukemia? (The Hanford, WA, nuclear
waste storage site near the Columbia River
already leaks today.) Since nuclear
power creates a range of problems that last
for centuries -- and even millennia -- we need
to re-think the way we calculate costs.
Dennis Rivers
The Nuclear Guardianship Library -- An archive of articles
from many perspectives on the long-term, responsible
care of nuclear materials.
The Growing Nuclear Danger
by Steven Weinberg, winner
of the Nobel Prize in Physics. A careful
evaluation of current nuclear dangers from a July,
2002, issue of The New York Review of Books.
A Background Briefing on
Radioactive Pollution -- A 26-page review of
problems associated with radioactive pollution from
nuclear power, weapons and waste -- by Wendy Oser and
Molly Young Brown, M.Div.
Citizen Action Guide USA for the
Abolition 2000 campaign to outlaw nuclear weapons -- A resource kit for
people in the United States who want to campaign
against nuclear weapons. Contains statements,
petitions, resolutions for schools, cities and
counties, and informative articles and declarations
concerning the dangers of nuclear weapons and the
pressing need to build a world-wide agreement to
outlaw them.
Paths beyond
violence: The Citizen's Coalition to
Reaffirm and Extend the Geneva Conventions -- In a world overwhelmed
by violence, the Geneva Conventions represent one of
the few examples of long term cooperation to limit the
violence of war. With the recent introduction of
Depleted Uranium bullets and anti-tank projectiles,
the violence of war now includes the radioactive
poisoning of civilians, which has take place in Bosnia
and is taking place today in Iraq. You are
invited to join this noble effort, which began in the
1860s by reaching out to many kings and princes, and
today needs to include all citizens of all countries.
Paths beyond
violence: A World Without Armies -- A growing number of
nations are interested in demilitarization. Costa Rica
provides a model for this, having abolished its armed
forces in 1949 and maintaining the highest living
standard in Central and South America. We work with
people in Costa Rica and endeavor to spread their
exemplary practice of having no army to other parts of
the world.
Guest Essays,
News Stories, Book Announcements:
2009: COGENERATION
as an alternative to more nuclear power plants.
Smart energy production (cogeneration, Combined
Heat and Power, CHP) can allow us to get lots more
benefit from the same cubic foot of natural gas.
In a cogeneration power plant, oil or natural
gas is burned in a boiler to make steam that turns a
turbine to generate electricity. The steam is
then piped through adjacent buildings to heat them in
the winter (or cool them in the summer, through the
magic of air conditioning engineering), greatly
lowering the overall utility cost for the school or
business, and reducing the total greenhouse gas
emissions as well. For examples of recent
cogeneration projects, please visit
the Goss Engineering web site and read the following book.
Sustainable On-Site CHP
Systems:Design, Construction and Operations
Plan,
design, construct, and operate a sustainable
on-site CHP (combined heat and power)
facility using the detailed information in
this practical guide. Sustainable On-Site
CHP Systems reveals how to substantially
increase the energy efficiency in
commercial, industrial, institutional, and
residential buildings using waste heat and
thermal energy from power generation
equipment for cooling, heating, and humidity
control. In-depth case studies illustrate
real-world applications of CHP systems.
Editors:
Milton Meckler, M.ASCE,
F.ASME, P.E., is president of Design
Build Systems (DBS), a company specializing in
commercial, industrial, and institutional MEP design
and construction. He was one of four Global Award
Finalists for McGraw-Hill’s Platts Energy Lifetime
Achievement Award.
Lucas Hyman, P.E., LEED AP, a professional mechanical
engineer with more than 25 years’ experience, is
president of Goss Engineering, Inc., a firm
specializing in district energy systems.
[Full disclosure:
Lucas Hyman, PE, president of Goss Engineering
and one of the leading cogeneration engineers
working in the field today, is the nephew of Dennis
Rivers, the editor of this web site and a web
programmer for Goss Engineering.]
"...the DOE
has come up with an ingenious plan to dispose
of its troublesome tons of [radioactive]
nickel, copper, steel, and aluminum. It wants
to let scrap companies collect the metal, try to
take the radioactivity out, and sell the metal to
foundries, which would in turn sell it to
manufacturers who could use it for everyday
household products: pots, pans, forks, spoons,
even your eyeglasses." (Web editor's note: Bad
publicity such as this article helped get this
program suspended by the DOE in July, 2000.
But the problem of radioactive materials migrating
into civilian prodicts is not over.)
Hope From Ashes: Why Remember
Hiroshima and Nagasaki? by Dennis Rivers, 2006.
"Every August 6th people around the
world gather to mark the deaths and injuries of the
inhabitants of the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
And once again we join them, gathering in this
memorial garden, surrounded by folded paper cranes,
and struggling to find an appropriate response to one
of the world's great catastrophes."
>>>
Dangerous development: The U.S. Senate is moving
toward authorizing the development of new nuclear weapons...
July 14,
2000: We Are Taking a Detour From
Deterrence, an
article in the L.A. Times by retired Rear
Admiral Eugene J. Carroll Jr., Vice President of the
Center for Defense Information in Washington.
>>> One objection to nuclear power is that it
requires superhuman levels of honesty, consistency and
reliability from a vast network of just plain human
beings. The story below reports the latest
trouble at Sellafield, England, site of the
disasterous 1957 Windscale nuclear fire...
>>>
For many years, advocates of nuclear energy have
argued that nuclear energy and nuclear weapons are two
separate issues. In fact, the two have always been
intertwined behind the scenes. The story below
documents the explicit linking of U.S. nuclear
power plant to the production of tritium for nuclear
weapons. The big question is: how many other
countries will convert their nuclear power plants to
atom bomb factories?...
>>>
March, 2000: Improvements
in local infant health observed after nuclear power
reactor closings...
Abstract of
journal article: Between 1987 and 1998,
operations ceased at 12 U.S. nuclear power reactors.
One of these, Rancho Seco, is located in a densely
populated area. After the reactor closed in
1989, significant decreases in mortality (all
causes and from congenital anomalies) and cancer
incidence were observed for fetuses, infants, and
small children. These trends contrast with a
worsening of infant health status after the plant
opened in 1974. The data suggest that a relationship
between nuclear emissions and adverse health effects
exists, especially since fetuses and newborns
are most sensitive to radiation. Because Rancho Seco
released low levels of radionuclides into the local
environment, the issue of health effects of
prolonged, low-dose radiation exposure is
raised. The matter becomes increasingly important as
operators of several dozen aging U.S. reactors must
soon decide whether to extend their operating
licenses.
From:
Environmental Epidemiology
and Toxicology (2000) 2, 32-36.
notes from the bottom of the radwaste
tank... Some
things to think about:
A = USA military budget for
2007: Approximately
700 billion dollars
B = Population of planet earth
in June 2007:
Approximately 6.6
billion people
Disturbing arithmetic:
A/B = approximately
$100 of U.S. guns, bombs, planes and military
pay for every man, woman and child on planet
Earth
(about $2,300 for
each US citizen and resident, young and old,
about $9,200 per
year for every US family of four)
Thought Questions:
At what point does something like this become
"too much" ?
What sort of tensions would the world have if
we spent this
amount on schools, hospitals, housing, solar
panels
and employment training around the
world?
What role do you play in relation to this
process (which
now influences most people on Planet Earth)?
How do you feel about the role you play in
this process?
Dennis
Rivers - June 2007
Links to major sources of anti-nuclear
information:
Los Alamos Study Group
advocates -- Nuclear Disarmament
-- Environmental Protection -- Social Justice --
Economic Sustainability. Opposes the emerging
new arms race that is being cloaked in the language
of "stockpile maintenance."
Tri-Valley CAREs -- Communities Against a Radioactive
Environment is located near the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory, which has been designing
nuclear warheads, and leaking radioactive material
into the neighborhood, for many decades.
Nuclear Information & Resource
Service
(Washington, DC). NIRS is an information and
networking center for citizens and environmental
organizations concerned about nuclear power,
radioactive waste, radiation, and sustainable energy
issues.
Greenpeace(Amsterdam) presents the latest
information on campaigns around the world to limit the
spread of nuclear contamination.
Earth Island Institute (San Francisco, Calif.) reports on
world-wide ecology issues (including nuclear waste and
power).
Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
(Santa Barbara, Calif.) features
articles and position papers on nuclear weapons
control and nuclear waste disposal.
A longer list of links to web sites with information about
nuclear and safe energy issues.
This web site
is sponsored by the nonukes.org consortium of peace,
ecology and educational groups, including...